Aumaï vs Yuka: Food Scanner or AI Coach?

On October 14, 2026, French broadcaster TF1 ran a segment on Yuka with a striking number: 23 million people in France open the app while they shop. If you have ever stood in a supermarket aisle, pointed your phone at a barcode, and watched a little score turn red, you already know what Yuka does. What it does not do is tell you whether the meal you cook tonight actually fits your week.

That gap is where the comparison with Aumaï gets interesting. Yuka and Aumaï both want you to eat better, but they work at opposite ends of the process: the shelf and the plate.

What Yuka does well

Yuka scans the barcode of a food or cosmetic product and returns a score out of 100, with a color from green to red. The food score blends three factors: nutritional quality (60%, based largely on the Nutri-Score), additives (30%), and whether the product is organic (10%). Scan a sugary cereal, see red, and the app suggests a cleaner alternative.

Stat: Yuka reports more than 85 million users across 15 countries and a database of around 6 million products, roughly 4 million food items and 2 million cosmetics.

Its credibility comes from independence. Founded in France in 2015 by Julie Chapon and her co-founders, Yuka takes no advertising and lets no brand pay to change a score, funded instead through its Premium plan (about 15 euros per year). For label decoding at the point of purchase, it is genuinely useful, and millions of shoppers treat it as a trusted second opinion.

Key Takeaway: Yuka is a product scanner. It rates what you are about to buy, which makes it strongest in the supermarket aisle, not at the dinner table.

Head-to-head

Feature	Aumaï	Yuka
Core job	Coach your meals and habits	Score packaged products
Logging	Text, photo, voice	Barcode scan
Tracks macros (incl. fiber)	6 macros, fiber included	No meal tracking
Conversational AI coach	Yes, with persistent memory	No
Channels	WhatsApp, web, app	App only
Handles home cooking	Yes (describe any dish)	Limited (needs a barcode)
Explains the why	Yes	Partial (additive info)
Price	4.99 euros/month	Free; Premium ~15 euros/year

Where Aumaï wins

Aumaï starts after the groceries are home. You describe a meal in a few words, snap a photo, or send a voice note, and the coach estimates calories and six macronutrients, including fiber, which most tracking tools skip. A barcode scanner cannot read a plate of homemade dal or a bowl of leftovers, because there is nothing to scan.

Key Takeaway: Yuka evaluates one product at a time. Aumaï looks at your whole day and week, so a Saturday raclette does not become a verdict on your diet.

The bigger difference is memory. Aumaï's coach remembers your past meals, your goals, and your patterns, so advice gets more specific over time. Yuka gives the same score for a product to every user, with no sense of your protein target or how you ate yesterday. If you want to understand why your dinner was heavy in saturated fat and what to swap next time, that is a coaching conversation, not a score. For readers moving on from calorie apps, we cover this shift in why food logging is evolving beyond MyFitnessPal.

Aumaï also meets you where you already are. Logging over WhatsApp means no extra app to open, and the same data shows up on the web dashboard and mobile app.

Where Yuka may suit you better

If your main concern is additives and processing in packaged goods, Yuka is hard to beat, and it is free. It shines for parents decoding snack labels, for anyone avoiding specific ingredients, and for quick comparisons between two jars on the same shelf. Its additive flags map onto real debates about ultra-processed food, a topic worth understanding in its own right, which we unpack in what actually counts as ultra-processed.

Yuka is also not trying to be a coach. It will not nag you about protein or fiber, and for shoppers who just want a trustworthy label reader, that focus is a feature, not a flaw.

Verdict

Use Yuka to shop smarter and Aumaï to eat smarter. They solve different problems, and plenty of people could happily run both. If you want a label referee at the supermarket, Yuka earns its place. If you want a coach who remembers your meals, tracks your macros including fiber, and talks you through the why over WhatsApp, Aumaï is built for that job. Fiber in particular is easy to under-eat; our guide on why most people fall short on fiber explains what good looks like.

Sources

FAQ

Is Yuka a calorie or macro tracker? No. Yuka scores packaged products for nutritional quality, additives, and organic status, but it does not log meals or count your daily calories and macros. For tracking what you actually eat, including fiber and protein, you need a food logging tool or a coach like Aumaï.

Can Aumaï scan barcodes like Yuka? Aumaï is built around describing meals by text, photo, or voice rather than scanning barcodes. That lets it handle home cooking and restaurant plates, which have no barcode. Yuka is the better choice if your goal is specifically rating packaged products on the shelf.

Is Yuka free? Yuka's core scanning is free. A Premium plan, around 15 euros per year, adds offline scanning, a search bar, unlimited history, and custom alerts for ingredients like palm oil, gluten, or lactose. Aumaï costs 4.99 euros per month after a 7-day trial.

Which should I use for weight or health goals? If your goal involves daily habits, macros, or coaching, Aumaï fits better because it tracks meals and remembers your progress. If you mainly want to avoid certain additives when shopping, Yuka helps at the point of purchase. Many people use both for different moments.

— Selena